I was once an unquestioning AGW believer, until I realised that 2.04 + 2.4 just didn’t make 4.5.
There is no empirical evidence that CO2 causes Glowbull warming.
Science is what got us to this level of civilisation, but no one wants to blame science for the problems they believe have been caused by this level of civilisation.
To quote Dr. Shermer: Skepticism is not a position; it’s a process.
NB: If you don’t know what AGW is, you shouldn’t be here.
“Denialist” is a malignant tumour that grows only inside the minds of indoctrinated catastrophists.
“I’m not sure which is more arrogant, to say we caused (global warming) or that we can fix it.”
AGW proponents must all believe in homeopathy if they think an extra 116 ppm CO2 above pre-industrial level can affect planetary climate.
“The 1997 to ’98 El Niño event was a trigger for the changes in the Pacific, and I think that’s very probably the beginning of the hiatus,”
“If you could vote for a change in climate, you would always want a warmer one,” says Philip Stott, emeritus professor of biogeography at the University of London. “Cold is nearly always worse for everything – the economy, agriculture, disease, biodiversity.”
“The IPCC was an ill considered concept. They never allowed for failure.”